The tragic Paris attacks sharpened the world’s awareness of
the reach of violent struggles in Syria, and cancelled a demonstration in Paris
expecting 200,000 marchers the eve of the international climate conference now
engaged.
But that’s not the only link between terror attacks and global
warming. For a decade, the Pentagon’s official threat assessments have pegged
global climate change as a major driver of conflicts and wars around the globe;
the rise of the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq is the first and most visible
proof.
In 2007-2010, Syria experienced unprecedented drought, surely
amplified by a warming climate. With 80% livestock death and 60% farm failure,
desperate millions left the land for cities unprepared to accommodate them. Overcrowding,
with an influx of Iraqi refugees, created ideal conditions first for uprisings
and civil war, then the shocking growth of an evil organization just waiting
for the opportunity to pounce and seize power.
For it is no coincidence that out of 1.6 billion or more
Muslims around the world, including 50 majority-Muslim nations, the Islamic State targetted this area of extreme instability to birth their new
“caliphate”. Their brand of evil and violent politics can only find fertile
ground where the real ground has been destroyed by war, weather or both.
Proof of the Pentagon’s dire predictions should sharpen our
will to address climate change with a global consensus: the time for dithering
has passed, we need binding agreements to reduce emissions, everywhere,
sufficiently to limit global warming to what we have already “locked in” with
our actions so far. If not, where will be the next drought- or flood-related
disaster, driving millions of climate refugees into nations already straining to
feed their own populations?
Sadly, there is still a lack of will to do what must be done.
The general excuse, as always, is the fear of acting first, or of going further
than others, and losing some kind of economic advantage to laggards who ignore
the threat or take advantage of other nations’ reductions to delay their own.
There's a line in the sand. |
There is only one way to overcome such hesitance: leadership in
action. Smaller nations and developing countries always look to larger or more
advanced peers for guidance and, even if subconsciously, model behaviour after
them. Which means that even if we don’t manage, at the end of the Paris talks,
to get sufficient or binding commitments from every nation, we must not give up
or shirk our own duty.
Canadians often think of themselves as globally
insignificant, an attitude climate deniers like to twist to their own ends. But
we are the 10th-largest economy in the world, at the highest general
standard of living, with trade ties all over the planet. When we do things, the
world notices what we do and how we do it.
Although Prime Minister Trudeau entered the climate talks
with the insufficient reduction pledge former Prime Minister Harper wrote,
there is still time, between now and when the agreement takes effect in 2020,
for Canadians to show that we can do more and better, and on top of that, prove
that we can prosper while aggressively reducing emissions. We have the
technology, such as our growing clean tech revolution, we have proven policy
tools, like BC’s successful carbon tax shift, we need only flex our leadership
muscles to move from climate change pariah to hero. Let’s do it!
Published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie Examiner.
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is
vice-president of the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.
No comments:
Post a Comment