"My father always advised me to be wary of men with hyphenated names who wear beards, tweed jackets, and smoke pipes" - Kent Smerdon
Pictured above: Kent Smerdon's worst nightmare
This letter ran in yesterday's Barrie Examiner, in response to an earlier letter (which has not been posted in the online edition). I post it here with hyperlinks to support references.
(Re: “Columnist
asked to ‘dial down the schoolyard bully rhetoric’” in the Aug. 21 edition of
the Examiner)
I would like to
thank Kent Smerdon for taking the time to read my columns and respond in these
pages. Since Mr. Smerdon identifies himself as a Rotarian, I would also like
him to know that I am thankful to the Barrie Rotary clubs for inviting me to
speak about federal policy on several occasions, and to the Shelburne Rotary
for sending me to visit the Alberta tar sands personally in 1989. I should note
that back then, the terms tar sands and oil sands were used interchangeably by
those in the industry, although technically both are incorrect; the sands contain
neither oil nor tar, but bitumen which can be refined, at high energy and
environmental cost, into synthetic heavy crude.
Mr. Smerdon feels
I am bullying when I take well-paid syndicated columnists to task for their
biases, using my own unpaid local column as a platform. This is certainly an
interesting take on what I see as a David-and-Goliath situation (with myself as
David). What is even stranger is that Ken began his criticism by mocking my
name, my appearance, and what he assumes is my wardrobe. Usually that itself is
an indication of bullying, no?
I actually am
very interested in debate; Canada is long overdue for a deep and thorough conversation
on the best way to make the reductions in carbon emissions our governments have pledged, and that are needed to forestall dangerous climate change. Whether a
carbon tax shift, or a fee-and-dividend, or cap-and-auction are the best
approach is something we must discuss and decide. Whether we redirect fossil
fuel subsidies toward transit, or clean energy, or conservation and efficiency,
is another debate I’m eager to enjoin.
I’ll admit not being
interested in a “debate” about the reality of how we are causing climate change
through our overuse of fossil fuels. The ones who benefit from that waste of
time are fossil fuel industries themselves, which is why they funnel money to
the same “independent” institutes who once worked hard to dismiss the harms of
smoking and second-hand smoke, so they can create similar doubt about
well-established climate science. These payments and spin strategies have been
well documented. If 97% of mechanics say your brakes are shot, are you going to
get them fixed, or visit the other 3%?
Mr. Smerdon’s
bullying of Al Gore is also a surprise. To attack the man for living in a
vintage 1920s home is a cheap shot, as is ignoring that he has converted it to
include offices for his several businesses and organizations, reducing the need to commute to work. Rather than an
energy hog, Mr. Gore has actually gone to the lengths of upgrading his home and
office to LEED Gold standards! He’s a man who walks the walk.
Mr. Smerdon
makes the same flawed assumption about me. I didn’t fly to the Chicago training
“burning oceans of jet fuel”, I shared a ride with three other people in a
Prius.
I don’t know
why it matters that Gore sold the TV-station he bought from the state-owned
media of one oil-producing nation (Canada’s CBC) to the state-owned media of
another (Qatar’s Al Jazeera), unless someone has found a way to transport oil
by cable or satellite. And the Oscar-winning documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” has held up very well over the years, despite having a few errors ordebatable points among the thousands of statements it presents. But unlike the
tired old arguments of climate-change deniers, Mr. Gore’s presentation, the one
I am trained to give, has been constantly updated to be accurate and current with
the latest climate science and world events.
I hope Mr.
Smerdon decides to attend a Climate Reality presentation and learn more. If he
has issues with the science, I can certainly put him in touch with actual
working climate scientists who can answer his questions, if I cannot.
Erich
Jacoby-Hawkins
Barrie, ON
Your response was far more polite than mine would have been, that's for sure. Fantastic letter, Erich. Unsupported nonsense needs to be called out whenever it's encountered.
ReplyDelete